Is Homeopathy Witchcraft? Part 3

Part 3: Why Homeopathy Can’t Be Redeemed: A Christian Perspective

The final article in our series addresses the big question: does homeopathy actually work and if so, by what means? Despite thousands of studies over 200 years, scientific evidence consistently shows that homeopathic remedies offer no measurable benefit beyond placebo. More concerning, the spiritual foundations of homeopathy may pose real dangers to families who rely on it. In this article, we’ll review the research, explore the risks, and offer a Biblical path forward for health and healing—including steps for repentance and restoration, and guidance from my book, Life to the Body: Biblical Principles for Health and Healing.

Reason #8: Homeopathy’s “Laws” Are Unscientific and Spiritually Misguided

Another critical reason homeopathy is dangerous is its reliance on Hahnemann’s so-called laws of cure. At first glance, these laws may sound like scientific principles. But true scientific laws are based on repeated observation and experimentation, and they can be disproven by new evidence. Hahnemann’s laws, however, fail every test of science, yet homeopathy persists in insisting that some undiscovered explanation will eventually validate them.

The cornerstone of homeopathy is the Law of Similar, the idea that a substance that causes symptoms in a healthy person can cure those same symptoms in the sick. On the surface, this sounds reasonable, and modern homeopaths try to tie it to conventional medicine. Dana Ulman, a leading spokesperson, compares it to radiation treating cancer or vaccinations building immunity. But these comparisons fail under scrutiny: conventional therapies contain measurable substances and undergo extensive clinical testing, whereas homeopathic remedies often contain no molecules of the original substance and have no verified mechanism.

William W. Browning, MD, exposes the absurdity. He wrote, Opium will control pain. Quinine will reduce fever. Alcohol and ammonia will relieve faintness. Now if “similia” be a law, opium ought to cause pain in the healthy; quinine, fever; alcohol, faintness, etc.; but this is not the case. [1]

Moreover, the Law of Similar is steeped in a worldview known as monism, which underpins many ancient and occult practices. Historical examples include eating a lion’s heart for courage, using snakeroot for snakebites, or carving images of gods to gain their power. Hahnemann borrowed this thinking from Paracelsus, known as the “Prince of Quacks,” who declared that herbs would cure ailments that resembled their anatomical or symbolic forms.

Scripture warns us by saying in Isaiah 44:20: “He feeds on ashes; a deluded heart has led him astray, and he cannot deliver himself, nor say, ‘Is there not a lie in my right hand?’” The Law of Similar promises healing, but it is built upon ancient superstition, idolatry, and false philosophy, not God’s truth.

Clinical research confirms what we might suspect: the Law of Similar is unsupported by physiology, pharmacology, or pathology. In short, the house of homeopathy rests upon sand, not rock.

That is the eighth reason homeopathy is unscientific and spiritually dangerous.

Reason #9: Homeopathy’s “Minimum Dose” Is Spiritualized, Not Scientific

The ninth reason homeopathy is dangerous is the Law of Infinitesimals—also called the minimum dose. Hahnemann realized that the logic of “like cures like” had obvious flaws. His solution? Give nothing—or almost nothing—at all. He proposed that the more a remedy is diluted and vigorously shaken, the more potent it becomes.

Hahnemann wrote in The Organon, “Modern wiseacres have even sneered at the thirtieth potency…[but] we obtain, even in the fiftieth potency, medicines of the most penetrating efficacy.”

Science, of course, tells a different story. Hahnemann was working before Avogadro’s number was determined, meaning he had no way to know that most homeopathic remedies contain no molecules of the original substance. Yet, he insisted the remedies worked by leaving a spirit-like essence that revived the body’s vital force. In his view, these were spiritual remedies for a spiritual condition. [2]

Some homeopaths later tried to anchor this law in science by claiming that water has memory. In 1988, French scientist Benveniste published research in the magazine Nature suggesting high dilutions could retain a memory of the original substance. But the findings could not be reproduced under proper scientific controls. Benveniste’s work was funded by a homeopathic manufacturer and was later discredited, even earning him Ig Nobel prizes for follow-up experiments.

Consider for a moment the implications if water really could remember everything it had ever touched. Would municipal water be unsafe to drink? Would any natural spring be free from harmful “memories?” Thankfully, God created water to obey His design, not to retain mystical powers.

Homeopathy’s minimum-dose principle relies entirely on spiritualized concepts, not chemistry or biology, making it both unscientific and spiritually deceptive.

That is the ninth reason homeopathy is not science but witchcraft.

Reason #10: The Laws of Single Remedy and Spiritual Cause Promote Occult Practices

The tenth reason homeopathy is spiritually concerning involves two others of Hahnemann’s laws: the Law of Single Remedy and the Law of Spiritual Cause.

The Law of Single Remedy dictates that only one homeopathic remedy should be used at a time to address the totality of symptoms. In practice, this is nearly impossible and those who purchase homeopathic remedies at the health food store likely do not realize they aren’t using them according to the laws of homeopathy. A practitioner must choose from roughly 2,500 substances, across 30 dilutions, and 20 pill forms—over a million possible combinations. Many homeopaths resort to trial and error, or employ occult tools like pendulums, muscle testing, and radionics to determine the “correct” remedy.

The Law of Spiritual Cause, emphasized in the later editions of Hahnemann’s Organon, asserts that all disease originates from the vital force, a spirit-like energy that animates the body. According to Hahnemann, illness is not caused by material substances but by disturbances in this spiritual energy. Homeopaths like Herbert Robert and Robert Field openly affirm that homeopathy is spiritual medicine, not physical medicine, and caution against trying to integrate it with conventional medical practices.

The spiritual implications are serious. Deuteronomy 18:10-12 warns: “There shall not be found among you anyone who…practices divination, interprets omens, or engages in witchcraft…for whoever does these things is an abomination to the LORD.” Reliance on occult methods and a focus on spiritual “energies” for healing places both the practitioner and the patient at risk.

Thus, the combination of these two laws demonstrates that homeopathy is not only scientifically invalid but spiritually dangerous, guiding people toward practices that Scripture calls abominations.

Reason #11: Homeopathy lacks credible scientific support

Homeopathy has been studied extensively for over two centuries, yet scientific evidence fails to support its claims. Many studies cited by proponents as proof of effectiveness have later been retracted, discredited, or exposed for serious methodological flaws. For example:

• A rat study testing the homeopathic poison oak remedy (Rhus Tox) was retracted due to major problems with the data. [3]

• A 2022 meta-analysis claiming homeopathy was effective for ADHD was withdrawn after reviewers found significant bias and data misrepresentation. [4]

• A 1986 study suggesting improvement in asthma from the remedy Dumcap was invalidated because the product was adulterated with steroids not listed on the label. [5]

• Even a high-profile 2022 study on homeopathy as an add-on for small-cell lung cancer faced credible allegations of data manipulation, resulting in an “expression of concern” from the publisher. [6]

• 
  

Systematic reviews confirm these isolated cases reflect the broader reality. The 2015 National Health & Medical Research Council (Australia) review of around 200 studies concluded that there was no reliable evidence that homeopathy is effective for any health condition, and that it should not be used for chronic or serious illnesses. [7] A 2023 review of studies on cancer care reached similar conclusions: there is no scientifically based hypothesis for how homeopathy works and no conclusive evidence of benefit. [8]

Edzard Ernst, a trained homeopath and prominent researcher, performed a systematic review of 17 prior reviews and stated plainly:

“…the hypothesis that any given homeopathic remedy leads to clinical effects that are relevantly different from placebo or superior to other control interventions for any medical condition is not supported by evidence from systematic reviews.” [9]

In short, homeopathy’s “laws” contradict the established laws of physics, chemistry, and biology, and its supposed remedies consistently fail rigorous testing. As David Gorski, MD, PhD notes, for homeopathy to work, several laws of physics would have to be spectacularly wrong. [10] Time and again, apparent positive outcomes are explained by bias, misrepresentation, or outright deception. As Thomas Paine famously asked: Is it more probable that nature should go out of her course or that a man should tell a lie? [11]

Conclusion: Understanding the True Nature and Danger of Homeopathy

After examining homeopathy from its origins, laws, and clinical research, one question persists: How does it actually work? While countless anecdotes suggest homeopathy “works,” rigorous scientific investigation has consistently found no reliable evidence that the remedies themselves produce results beyond placebo. Thousands of studies over two centuries, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses—including those conducted by trained homeopaths like Dr. Edzard Ernst—have confirmed the same conclusion: homeopathy is not an evidence-based therapy.

So why do people report improvement? Perhaps much of it can be explained by the placebo effect: the powerful response triggered by the lengthy, compassionate consultations typical of homeopathic practice, or simply by belief in the remedy. The body’s natural recuperative ability and spontaneous remission from illness also account for many perceived improvements. When remedies are adulterated—as with the asthma trial Dumcap—any apparent benefit may actually result from hidden drugs, not homeopathy itself.

But beyond these explanations lies a more serious concern: the spiritual nature of homeopathy. From its foundational belief in vital force to the methods of dilution and succussion intended to “spiritualize” a remedy, homeopathy is inseparably rooted in occult and pagan philosophy. Hahnemann himself described his remedies as spiritual medicines, not physical ones. Christian physicians and researchers caution that such hidden influences are potentially harmful, warning that homeopathy can expose individuals to occult forces and, in some cases, result in depression, physical harm, or even death when legitimate medical care is delayed or replaced by ineffective treatments.

For the Christian, this is especially concerning. Attempts to “redeem” homeopathy while ignoring its spiritual origins and fundamental nature is not possible, because its philosophy and methodology are inseparable from occult influences. As 1 Thessalonians 5:22 instructs, we are called to “abstain from every form of evil.” Homeopathy, with its occult underpinnings, fails to meet this standard and should be rejected as witchcraft. This isn’t a case of, “it’s all how you use it that matters.” God said in 1 Corinthians 10:21, You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons. You cannot partake of the table of the Lord and the table of demons. According to Scripture, some things cannot be redeemed.

In the end, understanding how homeopathy “works” reveals both the limits of human understanding and the risks of following remedies that contradict science and spiritual truth. Placebo effects and natural healing may produce temporary relief, but reliance on spiritualized remedies can lead to real harm. True health requires honesty, safety, and alignment with both the laws of the physical world and the Word of God.

For those who have previously used or are currently using homeopathy, I would like to suggest some action steps to take in repentance.

Action Steps of repentance:

1. Confess sin to the Lord: Bring your heart fully to Him, asking forgiveness for trusting in practices that contradict His truth. (1 John 1:9).

2. Destroy all remedies: Follow the Biblical example of ridding yourself of occult objects (Acts 19:19) and remove any homeopathic products, books, or paraphernalia from your home to break ties with spiritual influence.

3. Confess to others you may have wronged: If your use of homeopathy influenced family members or others to rely on it instead of seeking proper care, ask forgiveness and take responsibility for those consequences (James 5:16). Healing begins with honesty and restoration.

4. Receive God’s forgiveness and encouragement: Scripture promises, “Blessed is he whose transgressions are forgiven, whose sins the Lord does not count against him” (Psalm 32:1). God’s grace restores us and gives hope for a new way forward.

5. Embrace Biblical health principles: God has provided guidance for caring for your body, mind, and spirit. Learn what the Bible says about health and healing, and pursue treatments aligned with His wisdom. For practical guidance, I recommend my book, Life to the Body—Biblical Principles for Health and Healing, which outlines Scripture-based principles for thriving physically and spiritually.

   
   

God has a better way than homeopathy. By turning from practices rooted in deception and following His Word, you can experience true healing, protection, and peace. Trust Him—He knows what is best for your health and life. Go in peace.

---

Footnotes:

[1] Browning, William W. MD, “Modern Homeopathy: Its Absurdities and Inconsistencies.”

[2] NCAHF Position Paper on Homeopathy, November 10, 2020, https://quackwatch.org/ncahf/pp/homeop/

[3] “Permeable to bad science:” Journal retracts paper hailed by proponents of homeopathy, https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/11/permeable-to-bad-science-journal-retracts-paper-hailed-by-proponents-of-homeopathy/

[4] “Paper on homeopathy for ADHD retracted for ‘deficiencies,’“ https://retractionwatch.com/2023/11/01/paper-on-homeopathy-for-adhd-retracted-for-deficiencies/

[5] Morice, Alyn, Adulterated "Homoeopathic" Cure For Asthma, April 12, 1986DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90976-1)

[6] Ernst, Edzard, Guest post by Norbert Aust and Viktor, “Michael Frass’ research into homeopathy for cancer: ‘numerous breaches of scientific integrity,’” October 27, 2022, Weisshäuplhttps://edzardernst.com/2022/10/michael-frass-research-into-homeopathy-for-cancer-numerous-breaches-of-scientific-integrity/

[7] NHMRC Information Paper: Evidence on the effectiveness of homeopathy for treating health conditions. National Health and Medical Research Council. 2015. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council, March 2015.

[8] Wagenknecht A, Dörfler J, Freuding M, Josfeld L, Huebner J. Homeopathy effects in patients during oncological treatment: a systematic review. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 May;149(5):1785-1810. doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-04054-6. Epub 2022 Jun 22. PMID: 35731274; PMCID: PMC10097733. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35731274/

[9] Ernst E. A systematic review of systematic reviews of homeopathy. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002 Dec;54(6):577-82. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2002.01699.x. PMID: 12492603; PMCID: PMC1874503, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1874503/

[10] Gorsky, David, Ph.D., M.D., “Clinical trials of homeopathy versus ‘respect for science,”” Science-Based Medicine, March 9, 2015, https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/prior-plausibility-versus-homeopathy-and-an-unethical-trial-at-the-university-of-toronto/

[11] Paine, Thomas, The Age of Reason, January 27, 1794.